![]() ![]() City of Chicago, the Supreme Court held in a 5–4 ruling that the Second Amendment applies to state and local governments in addition to the federal government. Otis McDonald and three other Chicago residents sued the city over the ban, and because the Heller decision only applied federally, the Supreme Court agreed to hear the case. In 2010, the Supreme Court heard a case challenging Chicago’s handgun ban, one similar to DC’s recently overturned ban. AN EXTENSION OF HELLER TO STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS: MCDONALD V. Rather, the last decade of post- Heller litigation has demonstrated that the decision was a limited ruling fully compatible with the many lifesaving gun laws that protect us today. ![]() The Heller decision was far from the blanket endorsement of unlimited gun rights that the gun lobby hoped it might be. Impose conditions on the commercial sale of firearms.Forbid firearm possession in sensitive places such as schools and government buildings.Prohibit firearm possession by dangerous people.The Court provided examples of laws it considered “presumptively lawful,” including those which: not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose.” Writing for the majority, Justice Scalia noted: “Like most rights, the right secured by the Second Amendment is not unlimited. In its decision, authored by Justice Antonin Scalia, the Supreme Court was careful to stress the limited nature of its ruling. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |